Art is art. The nude female form can be found just about anywhere! And trust me, if some 12 year old wanted to see a pair of boobs, it wouldn't be hard with a click of a mouse. This is nothing compared to the endless limits of the internet. If your going to preach then take it somewhere else...
I have left other comments so I won't be redundant here. Sufice it to say it excites the mind of the possibilities new techniques open up in the world of art.
One question though, 3 cameras shooting at 1/10,000, probably started seconds before the milk is thrown...
How many images did you end up with at the end of this shoot alone? Obviously you would concern yourself with the actual splash moment but still... thats still something like 800 images per camera each in just a few seconds?
Okay, idiot me... You could have a light sensor or trigger to start cameras at the moment, but that is still alot of images to review. Heh, heh, no matter the technology sweat and tears are still needed, creation of art never truely changes much does it.
Do you not have the ability to show your child this on your account? That therefore makes it your choice as the Parent to allow it.
I for one am a mother of a 9yr old daughter and a 11yr old son. If I saw an image that I thought they would benefit from seeing I have the choice to show them, but when they log in on their own account(mature turned off) I expect the artist and the models to be respectful of my right to choose.
therefore yes I am glad it is defined as mature content.
Ty for respecting parents right to govern what there children are exposed too.
the mature tag is not about your belief of what is offensive or not, it is about what is clearly defined as mature.
whatever...i think that argument is completely redundant.....breasts? offensive? cause of perversion? seriously get a clue. take your clothes off and see for yourself...everyone's naked under their clothes...there is only a problem when we THINK that there is a problem. our reservations are what causes the issues here. go live on a farm with quakers or something if you have a problem with society evolving. because that is exactly what these artists are trying to do right?....evolve for fuck sake!!!
im kind of late on the subject but i feel this image is beautiful and you would be surprised at my age, i agree that most americans that i know would consider this to be offensive. it all depends on what the kid/teen was exposed to. im a mix of both european and american so i can see it both ways. i feel you shouldnt have to block something beautiful. the parents, knowing there childs maturity, should control there childs "searching" im considered mature enough by my parents to see a beautiful image of the female body. humans are natural beautiful creatures. im a guy and no im not gay hope my opinion helps somewhat. this shouldnt be blocked whatsoever. think of all the young intellectual kids who would miss this because there parents have content blocked. if public schools think kids should go to museum and see a nude statue or painting of a nude women why shouldnt this image be aloud to be seen. i personally think it would fit nicely in a museum
Tbh. This is an art website, should you be here if you don't understand that. Different people are offended by different things and I understand that however if you take children to an art museum or whichever, they are bound to see this type of exposure. It is no way inteded to be offensive to anyone, it is art. In museums there are statues and paintings that show nudity, are you going to go in there, tell them to take down the timeless pieces of art because they are 'indecent.' No you wouldn't.
Damn me and my mouth. Anyways, if you get my point. Beautiful stunning work. I love the way she is standing. Just outstanding picture.